| Justice,
in Kenyan prisons, is slow to come. Some human rights activists
visit prisoners regularly and often complain that there
are being killed when they are probably
innocent. Indeed, innocent or not, the sympathy ends
there. Every day is hell. Uncertainty. Kenyan law does not
specify a time within which the sentence should be carried
out.
Of
the 3,584 Kenyans convicted of murder and robbery with violence
between 1963 and 1987, only 280 have been hanged. Within
the period, 1,755 had their death sentences commuted to
life imprisonment.
By
January 5, 2001, at least 1,925 inmates were on death row.
Of this, 1,777 were waiting for their appeals to be heard.
Only 146 had their appeals finalised and were waiting to
be executed.
The
last hanging was in 1987, when 1982 coup plotters Hezekiah
Ochuka and Pancras Oteyo Okumu were executed. Since then,
a sort of de facto moratorium has been operational.
Human
rights activists argue that letting people live in uncertainty
is inhuman. "It dehumanises people, makes people live
in fear," says Amolo Otiende, the secretary, International
Commission of Jurists, Kenya Chapter.
Debate
has been raging about capital punishment, the archaic rule
that demands an eye for an eye. It is about retribution.
Should murder be punished by murder, or should those who
use violence to rob be killed?
For
a while, authorities and human rights crusaders have bickered
on the issue. Twice in 10 years, Parliament has defeated
motions by Imenti South MP Kiraitu Murungi to have this
penalty abolished. The Standing Committee on Human Rights,
a State department that investigates human rights abuses,
has also campaigned for the scrapping of the death penalty
from the statute books.
"It
is repugnant to human dignity and the precepts of human
rights to keep inmates on death row for so long in inhuman
conditions," the committee said in a report.
Judges
opposed to such killing have their hands tied. Law schools
teach that the law has to be followed to the letter, and
for Kenya's case, the death penalty is a deterrent.
Some
proponents claim deterrence is the objective - put a price
tag on death and potential killers will think twice.
Others
argue that hanging a person is useless, hardly a deterrent
and morally repulsive. "It is totally against human
rights and it should be abolished. It is time to rethink
about it," says criminal lawyer Pravin Bowry.
Moralists
also argue that a state that hangs an individual is just
as brutal as the criminal. What will be the drive to kill
someone who has killed another? Whom are you rehabilitating
in this case?
"In
courts, judges and magistrates have taken the penalty casually
because the convicts will not be killed after all,"
says Mr Bowry. He is among lawyers who have consistently
opposed the penalty.
Accuracy
of the judicial system is what fuels the abolitionists,
placing them on a collision course with proponents of the
penalty.
Reports
of disappearance of court files have been common in the
past. Moreover, police have framed up individuals and in
many cases, failed to carry out thorough investigations.
Thus many people have been wrongfully convicted. Corruption
has also undermined the penal and judicial process.
Indeed,
in many cases, the principle of "unequivocally guilty"
has been flouted because of such flaws. And this perhaps
explains the high incidence of success of appeals.
"Trials
leading to death penalty are often deeply flawed. Confessions
are made under torture," adds Mr Bowry.
Mburu
may be innocent or guilty. But were he to be innocent, he
may have been convicted on a flawed law that denied him
legal representation. The fraud may have begun at the police
station and ended up in court.
As
authorities dither on this issue, death row inmates die
in Kamiti, Naivasha, Shimo la Tewa, Kodiaga, and King'ong'o.
The way of the law has refused to be the way of justice.
Investigations
reveal that between August 12 and August 19, 2002, about
400 death row inmates in Block G at Kamiti Prison staged
a hunger strike, protesting against poor food and lack of
medical attention.
Dispute
often dogs prison deaths. Inquiries are often met by excuses,
half-truths and outright lies.
During
an investigation into deaths at Shimo la Tewa by the human
rights committee, inmates said 14 prisoners had died but
official prison records indicated nine. A combined death
register from the clinic and prison records showed 17 inmates
had died.
Reports
of the horrid prison conditions are hardly new. Last June,
President Moi was handed a report that detailed the deaths
of nine prisoners at Shimo la Tewa the previous month.
During
investigations, the committee says it encountered "critically
ill inmates who ought to have been in the hospital receiving
specialised care, but who were instead in cells."
Mburu
has waited 15 years to get medicine from relatives, for
his appeal case is yet to be mentioned. He hardly knows
how longer he will wait.
The
rights of death row convicts, like other inmates, are abused.
Owing to bad working conditions, prison warders have been
forced to live off inmates.
"They
take the little ration available, they also take the medicines.
And they beat us badly," said an inmate.
In
Kamiti, an eight by eight foot cell meant for four inmates
accommodates 16. Shimo la Tewa, built in 1953 to accommodate
708 inmates, now has 2,329. Kamiti has about three times
its capacity.
At
any one time last year, Nairobi remand held 3,200 against
its 1,000 capacity, and Kakamega 1,070 against a capacity
of 350.
But
the problem goes beyond just accommodation, food and healthcare.
Prisons
is among the most underfunded departments despite its crucial
role. The total current budget is Sh2.6 billion but only
Sh400 million is allocated for food for more than 40,000
inmates. This translates to Sh28 per prisoner a day.
Drugs
are allocated Sh2.5 million. Inmates reportedly earn a paltry
Sh170,000. |